Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Authors:||Palmer, Ana Claudia Souza|
Souza, Andressa de
Santos, Vinicius Souza dos
Cavalheiro, José Antônio Crespo
Zucatto, Angela Erguy
Biazus, Jorge Villanova
Torres, Iraci Lucena Da S.
|Title:||The effects of melatonin on the descending pain inhibitory system and neural plasticity markers in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial|
|Publisher:||Frontiers in Pharmacology|
|Citation:||PALMER, A. C. S. et al. The effects of melatonin on the descending pain inhibitory system and neural plasticity markers in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Frontiers in Pharmacology, v. 10, p. 1-12, nov. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2019.01382/full. Acesso em: 10 set. 2021.|
|Abstract:||Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer (ACBC) has been associated with fatigue, pain, depressive symptoms, and disturbed sleep. And, previous studies in non-cancer patients showed that melatonin could improve the descending pain modulatory system (DPMS). We tested the hypothesis that melatonin use before and during the first cycle of ACBC is better than placebo at improving the DPMS function assessed by changes in the 0–10 Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) during the conditioned pain modulating task (CPM-task) (primary outcome). The effects of melatonin were evaluated in the following secondary endpoints: heat pain threshold (HPT), heat pain tolerance (HPTo), and neuroplasticity state assessed by serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), tropomyosin kinase receptor B, and S100B-protein and whether melatonin’s effects on pain and neuroplasticity state are due more so to its impact on sleep quality. Methods: Thirty-six women, ages 18 to 75 years old, scheduled for their first cycle of ACBC were randomized to receive 20mg of oral melatonin (n = 18) or placebo (n = 18). The effect of treatment on the outcomes was analyzed by delta (Δ)-values (from pre to treatment end). Results: Multivariate analyses of covariance revealed that melatonin improved the function of the DPMS. The Δ-mean (SD) on the NPS (0–10) during the CPM-task in the placebo group was −1.91 [−1.81 (1.67) vs. −0.1 (1.61)], and in the melatonin group was −3.5 [−0.94 (1.61) vs. −2.29 (1.61)], and the mean difference (md) between treatment groups was 1.59 [(95% CI, 0.50 to 2.68). Melatonin’s effect increased the HPTo and HPT while reducing the (Δ)-means of the serum neuroplasticity marker in placebo vs. melatonin. The Δ-BDNF is 1.87 (7.17) vs. −20.44 (17.17), respectively, and the md = 22.31 [(95% CI = 13.40 to 31.22)]; TrKB md = 0.61 [0.46 (0.17) vs. −0.15 (0.18); 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.73)] and S00B-protein md = −8.27[(2.89 (11.18) vs. −11.16 (9.75); 95% CI = −15.38 to −1.16)]. However, melatonin’s effect on pain and the neuroplastic state are not due to its effect on sleep quality. Conclusions: These results suggest that oral melatonin, together with the first ACBC counteracts the dysfunction in the inhibitory DPMS and improves pain perception measures. Also, it shows that changes in the neuroplasticity state mediate the impact of melatonin on pain.|
|Appears in Collections:||Artigo de Periódico (PPGSDH)|
Files in This Item:
|The effects of melatonin.pdf||1,33 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.